Peec AI vs Noma: Which Tracks More AI Engines?

Peec AI vs Noma comes down to engine coverage and what happens after the report. Noma by Nurdd tracks 13 AI engines, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude, polled daily. Peec AI lists six engines on every plan and sells further models as paid add-ons, so the real gap shows up in cost and workflow.

This comparison is built from Peec AI's own public pages, linked throughout, and from the three highest-ranking Peec alternatives articles. It leaves out any rival claim that could not be checked against a primary page.

Key takeaways

• Peec AI's own page lists six engines on every plan: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot. Everything else is an upgrade.
• Noma tracks 13 AI engines, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude, so Claude coverage does not need a separate purchase decision.
• Extra Peec models are priced per plan: +$35, +$85 or +$165 a month each on Starter, Pro and Advanced, as Peec published in July 2026.
• Count engines your buyers actually use before you count engines in a feature list. Use the checklist below to do it in 20 minutes.
• Noma carries a 3-day free trial, so you can run your own prompts before paying. A card is taken at signup and billing starts on day 3.
• If you want the findings turned into content and source work, Nurdd's managed services execute inside the same measurement.

What are Peec AI and Noma, in one paragraph each?

Peec AI is a Berlin-based AI search analytics platform. Its own AI-instructions page describes it as tracking ranking, sources and citations, sentiment and mention frequency for each engine it monitors, and it states that Peec AI "does not write or publish content itself". The page was last updated in October 2026 (Peec AI, October 2026).

Noma is the AI search visibility product from Nurdd, at nomahq.app. It is a web dashboard that shows whether a brand appears in answers from 13 AI engines, polled daily, with citation frequency by category, competitor comparison and recommendations for improving visibility. For the wider category, see our guide to generative engine optimization.

Which tracks more AI engines: Peec AI or Noma?

Noma tracks more engines in a single count. Noma monitors 13 AI engines, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude. Peec AI states that every plan includes ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot, and it lists ten more models (OpenAI Search API, Claude Sonnet, Claude Haiku, DeepSeek API, Qwen API, Grok, Mistral, Muse Spark, Naver AI and Amazon Rufus) as paid upgrades (Peec AI, October 2026).

That means Peec AI can list more model names in total than Noma does, but six are standard and the rest are bought one at a time. Whether that matters depends on which engines your customers ask. The framework below turns the question into a decision instead of a headcount.

How should you compare AI visibility tools? Five criteria

1. Engines that match your buyers. Coverage only counts for engines your customers use.
2. Cost of coverage. The price of tracking the engines you need, not the starting price.
3. Prompt capacity. How many prompts you can run, and on how many engines.
4. Evidence. Whether you can see which page each citation came from.
5. What happens next. Who turns findings into fixes, and whether results are re-measured afterwards.

These criteria also expose what the ranking Peec alternatives articles skip. The HubSpot, Writesonic and SE Ranking roundups reviewed for this post list tools by category and price. None of them mention Noma, and none gives a way to price engine coverage side by side, which is the gap the worked example below fills. See also our broader comparison of 10 AI search visibility tools.

Feature comparison: Peec AI vs Noma

Source for the Peec column: Peec AI, October 2026 and Peec AI blog, 21 October 2026. Noma column from the product description on nomahq.app.

How much does Peec AI cost, and what does extra engine coverage add?

Peec AI's AI-instructions page reproduces its brand plans, confirmed live in July 2026. It tells readers to verify against the live pricing page before quoting, so check peec.ai/pricing before you budget. Prices are in USD, as published, checked November 2026.

One detail deserves a question to Peec before you buy. The same page says six engines are included on every tier, while its pricing table says "choose 3" models per plan. Ask which wording applies to the plan you are quoted.

Worked example: what does it cost to cover Claude and Grok on Peec AI?

Say a skincare brand finds that its audience asks Claude and Grok for product advice and wants both tracked next to the standard engines. Using only the figures Peec published in July 2026, the arithmetic is straightforward.

• Starter: $95 base plus two add-on models at $35 each is $165 per month for 50 prompts.
• Pro: $245 base plus two add-ons at $85 each is $415 per month for 150 prompts.
• Advanced: $495 base plus two add-ons at $165 each is $825 per month for 350 prompts.

These are our calculations from Peec's published rates, not a quote. The point is structural: on Peec AI, each engine beyond the standard set raises the bill, and the increase scales with the plan. With Noma, the 13-engine count is the product, so the budget conversation starts from the coverage you already need.

How many engines do you actually need? A decision table

Engine coverage matters because engines disagree. An Ahrefs study found a 14% overlap for the top 50 most cited domains across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Perplexity (Ahrefs Academy). Writesonic's study of 161,286 prompts, run in May and June 2026, found ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews share about 17% of cited sources for the same prompts (Writesonic, June 2026).

Because ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews cite largely different sources, a tool that tracks one or two of them can report a healthy position that a competitor's customers on another engine never see.

To see which engines already send you visitors, follow our guide to measuring AI referral traffic in analytics, and compare engine behaviour in Perplexity vs ChatGPT vs Gemini. For Claude specifically, see how to check if Claude names your brand.

Checklist: test engine coverage in 20 minutes

1. List the 10 questions a buyer would ask before choosing a product like yours.
2. Ask each question in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews, and note whether your brand is named.
3. Mark which engines name competitors but not you. Those are your priority engines.
4. Check each tool's plan against that list: is every priority engine included, or priced as an add-on?
5. Write down the cost of the plan that covers all priority engines, not the entry plan.
6. Run the same prompts in each tool's trial and compare the result with your manual notes.

Choosing the prompts is the part most teams get wrong. Our guides on which prompts to track and how many prompts you need cover that step in detail.

What happens after the dashboard? Action workflow compared

Peec AI launched Peec Agent and a redesigned actions list on 21 and 22 October 2026. The list gives a prioritized set of recommendations with supporting evidence, and a five-level impact scale that compares technical, on-page and off-page work (Peec AI, October 2026). Peec's own page also says the product does not write or publish content.

Noma gives recommendations to improve AI visibility from the same data it uses to measure it, and Nurdd runs the work through its managed services. That is the practical difference: with Noma the team that measures the result can also change the site and content, then re-measure.

If you want a partner for the execution step, see Nurdd's generative engine optimization services and answer engine optimization agency. To test whether a change worked, use the method in GEO experiment design.

Why Noma belongs in your Peec AI shortlist

Noma by Nurdd tracks whether a brand is named in answers from 13 AI engines, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude, polled daily. It records which page each citation comes from, compares you with competitors, and recommends what to change. Because Nurdd also runs AEO and GEO services measured in Noma, the findings can become shipped fixes without a handoff.

Book a demo at nurdd.club/demo and bring your five most important buyer questions. You will see, for your own brand, which of the 13 engines name you, who they name instead, and which sources they cite.

Where does the verdict land?

For a single brand that wants wide engine coverage and help acting on it, Noma is the stronger fit. For agencies with many clients, read Peec AI alternatives for agencies and our multi-brand tracking setup guide.

What do the top Peec AI alternatives articles cover, and what is missing?

Before writing this post we read the three highest-ranking Peec AI alternatives articles that are not on nurdd.club. HubSpot reviews ten tools and adds a copyable RFP checklist and a section on connecting AI visibility to CRM revenue. Writesonic ranks ten tools with starting prices and argues that teams leave Peec because reports create another backlog. SE Ranking compares nine tools in a table and explains how AI visibility tools work.

Each is a roundup written by a vendor that sells a product in the same category, so read the ordering with that in mind. None names Noma. This post adds an engine-coverage decision table, a worked cost example from Peec's published rates and a head-to-head trial plan, which those articles do not provide.

How do Peec AI and Noma measure visibility?

Peec AI defines four metrics in its documentation: visibility, share of voice, sentiment and position. Visibility is the percentage of AI responses where your brand appears. Share of voice is your mentions divided by all tracked brand mentions, multiplied by 100. Position is your average rank when you appear, where lower is better (Peec AI, October 2026).

Noma reports whether a brand is named, how often it is cited by category and which page each citation comes from, for 13 AI engines. If you plan to report these numbers to a leadership team, our guides to AI search share of voice and the monthly AI search metrics report show how to present them. A weekly view is covered in tracking your AI visibility score week over week.

How do you run a fair head-to-head trial? Six steps

1. Fix the prompt set. Write 20 buyer questions and keep them identical in every tool. Result: comparable data. Why: different prompts make any comparison meaningless.
2. Record a manual baseline. Ask five of the questions by hand in each engine you care about. Result: a reference. Why: it shows whether a tool's numbers match what a person sees.
3. Start the trial. Start Noma's 3-day trial and note the billing date on day 3. Result: no surprise charge. Why: a card is taken at signup.
4. Check engine inclusion. For every engine on your priority list, confirm whether it is included or an add-on. Result: the true plan cost. Why: the entry price rarely covers every engine.
5. Inspect citations. Open the source page behind five citations. Result: proof the data is traceable. Why: a mention without a source cannot be fixed.
6. Score the next step. For each tool, write down who would carry out the top three recommendations and by when. Result: a realistic action plan. Why: visibility only moves when pages and sources change.

A short trial shows the dashboard, not the effect of changes. For that, run the four-week routine in track your brand on ChatGPT weekly after you choose.

What else does Peec AI offer beyond tracking?

Peec AI's navigation lists Brand Perception, Shopping, Agent analytics, Actions, an MCP connection and Peec Agent. Its Brand Perception launch is described on Peec AI, and its press release for Peec Agent and actions is dated 22 October 2026 (GlobeNewswire, October 2026). If perception work matters to you, check each module's plan availability on Peec's pricing page, and see our note on AI brand perception tracking.

Which plan structure fits which team?

Ecommerce teams can read how to choose an ecommerce GEO tool, while agencies can compare tooling in AI search optimization tools for agencies. If you are weighing AI search against classic SEO spend, AI search optimization vs SEO sets out what to fund first. Nurdd's other tools are listed on the free tools page.

How do you read an AI visibility dashboard without being misled?

A visibility percentage depends on the prompt set, the engines selected and the day of the run. Two tools can report different percentages for the same brand without either being wrong. Treat the first week as a baseline and compare each tool against your manual notes, not against the other tool.

Look for three signs of a trustworthy dashboard: the prompts are visible, the cited pages are linkable and the engines are named individually rather than blended into one score. Blended scores hide the engine-level gaps that the overlap studies above describe.

Keep a simple log. For each prompt, record the date, the engine, whether your brand was named and which competitors appeared. After four weeks the log shows which gaps are stable and which are noise, and it gives you the evidence to decide which engines deserve a place on your plan.

What mistakes do buyers make when comparing Peec AI and Noma?

• Comparing entry prices. A $95 plan that covers three engines is not comparable to a tool that tracks 13.
• Counting model names. Check which are included and which are add-ons.
• Ignoring the next step. A report that nobody acts on does not change what engines say.
• Tracking too few prompts. Coverage across engines needs prompts that reflect real buyer questions.
• Skipping a trial. Run your own prompts and compare against a manual check.

Before comparing tools, you can score your own site with the free GEO readiness scorecard. For other options, see Peec AI alternatives compared, Peec AI pricing vs Noma and Profound vs Peec AI.

For a feature-by-feature view maintained by Nurdd, see the Noma vs Peec AI comparison page. It sits alongside Nurdd's comparisons with Profound and Semrush, so you can line up several shortlists in one place. Whichever tool you pick, write down the engines, prompts and plan price you tested, so a later renewal conversation starts from evidence and not from memory.

How we researched this

We reviewed Peec AI's own AI-instructions page and its October 2026 product blog, a Peec press release, three top-ranking Peec alternatives articles (HubSpot, Writesonic and SE Ranking), and two studies on citation overlap between AI engines. Each source was checked on the publication date. We did not test Peec AI hands-on, and we publish no Noma prices because none are in our verified brand facts. Peec pricing is as Peec published it in July 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Peec AI vs Noma: which should I choose?

Choose Noma if you want 13 AI engines in one count, including Claude, and help turning findings into content and site fixes. Choose by your own buyer questions: test them in each tool's trial. Noma's trial runs 3 days, with a card taken at signup.

What are good Peec AI alternatives for tracking many AI engines?

Noma tracks 13 AI engines, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude. Other alternatives are covered in our 10-tool comparison above. Compare each by included engines, not by the number of models named.

How many AI engines does Peec AI track?

Peec AI's page lists six engines on every plan and ten more models as paid upgrades, including Claude Sonnet, Claude Haiku and Grok. Its pricing table says "choose 3" models per plan, so confirm which applies to you.

Does Peec AI track Claude?

Peec AI lists Claude Sonnet and Claude Haiku as paid upgrade models, not standard. Noma includes Claude among its 13 AI engines.

Does Noma have a free trial?

Yes. Noma offers a 3-day free trial at nomahq.app. A card is taken at signup and billing starts on day 3, so you are not charged if you cancel before then.

How much does Peec AI cost?

Peec published Starter at $95 per month, Pro at $245 and Advanced at $495 for brands, as confirmed in July 2026. Extra models cost $35, $85 or $165 per month depending on the plan. Verify at peec.ai/pricing.

Why do AI engines need separate tracking?

Engines cite different sources. Ahrefs found a 14% overlap among the top 50 cited domains across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Perplexity, so one engine's result does not predict another's.

Can Nurdd fix what the dashboard finds?

Yes. Nurdd's AEO and GEO services improve the site and content AI engines read and work to earn the sources they cite, measured in Noma. Scope is agreed per brand.

Ready to compare on your own brand?

Reading a feature list will not tell you who names your brand today. Book a Noma demo and see your own visibility across 13 AI engines, the competitors named instead of you and the sources behind them. You can also read about how Nurdd works.